Search Results for "securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "securitisation"

404 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 404 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor's Property — Maintains That Guarantor Is a 'Borrower' Under Section 2(1)(f) of SARFAESI Act and That Writ Jurisdiction Is Not Available When Alternative Statutory Remedy Exists Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Latif Yusuf Manikkoth, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the possession notice issued by the Bank of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Property Mutation and Sales Tax Recovery Case — High Court's Direction to Delete Adverse Entries and Mutate Property Set Aside. The Court held that the High Court exceeded its writ jurisdiction by directing mutation without considering the State's statutory charge under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court heard two sets of civil appeals filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh and its officers against a judgment of the Himachal Pradesh H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Secured Creditor Against Tax Recovery Attachment — Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over income tax dues, and the attachment order passed after creation of security interest is void.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., a securitization and asset reconstruction company registered under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

14 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

1 Dec 2016

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State of Kerala's Claim for Sales Tax Arrears in Liquidation, Holding Section 26B of Kerala General Sales Tax Act Overrides Companies Act Priority. The court directed the Official Liquidator to release Rs.68,55,885/- to the State, recognizing the first charge created by Section 26B over the claims of secured creditors and workmen.

11 Aug 2010

The State of Kerala filed an application before the Bombay High Court seeking an order directing the Official Liquidator of Poysha Industrial Company ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)