KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "section 31(5) service"
351 result(s) found
Found 351 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Teacher for Misconduct in Minority School — Procedural Compliance Under MEPS Act Not Required for Unauthorized Absence. Termination of a probationary teacher for unauthorized absence and misconduct is valid even without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, as the school is a minority institution and the teacher was on probation.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions challenging termination of teachers by private schools claiming minority status. The lead petition is by Ra...
- 179
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
15 Feb 2021The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...
- 1088
High Court
High Court Quashes Dismissal Order and Inquiry Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice and Inconsistency with Criminal Acquittal. Disciplinary action set aside as inquiry conducted ex-parte despite medical incapacity and identical charges led to acquittal in criminal trial, rendering dismissal unjust under Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964.
5 Mar 2026The petitioner, an Assistant Commandant in the Central Industrial Security Force, challenged his dismissal order dated 23 December 2014 and the underl...
- 313
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Teacher Challenging Dismissal Without Inquiry. Dismissal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice and Service Rules.
6 Oct 2017The petitioner, Khizer Salim Mirza, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher with the Zilla Parishad, Beed. He was dismissed from service by order dated ...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Assessee's Belated Challenge to Penalty Notice in Income Tax Appeal; Court Examines Whether 30-Year-Old Defect in Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) Can Vitiate Penalty Absent Prejudice. The court focused on the threshold test of factual prejudice and whether a technical plea not raised before lower forums can be urged in a Section 260A appeal.
11 Jan 2024The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income-tax...
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Personal Guarantor Against Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process Under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority correctly admitted the application under Section 95 of the IBC as the debt was due and default occurred, and the personal guarantor's objections regarding limitation and pending proceedings were not sustainable.
30 Nov -0001The appeal was filed by Mahdoom Bava Bahrudeen Noorul Ameen (Appellant) under Section 61(3) read with Section 61(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy C...
- 170
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.
25 Sep 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...
- 306
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in IHSDP Housing Scheme Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, 409, 464, 465, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 IPC and Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as sanction for prosecution was not obtained for public servant co-accused, vitiating the entire prosecution.
9 Jun 2023The applicants, Girdharilal Madhavdas Ramrakhya, Santosh Sitaram Jaiswal, Nazeemuddin Bashiruddin Shaikh, and Rajesh Santumal Kamra, filed a criminal ...
- 38
