Search Results for "section 22A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 22A"

149 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

5 Aug 2016

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Creditor-Bank's Appeal in Insolvency Notice Case — Recovery Certificate Issued by DRT Cannot Form Basis for Insolvency Notice under Section 9(2) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. The Court Holds That Term 'Decree or Order' in Section 9(2) Must Be Strictly Construed to Exclude Recovery Certificates as the Insolvency Act Carries Grave Civil Consequences and Insolvency Notice Is Not a Mode of Execution.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from an attempt by a creditor-bank to initiate insolvency proceedings against a guarantor director based on a recovery certificate i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order in Service Matter Due to Non-Compliance with Review Requirement Under Rule 4(5)(a) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979. Suspension Invalid as Not Reviewed Within 90 Days, Petitioner Entitled to Reinstatement with Consequential Benefits.

22 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Hiralal Rama Jadhav, was serving as Superintendent of Prison at Thane Central Jail since 15/02/2016. On 29/08/2016, a lady constable s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

28 Apr 2026

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Un-Executed Conveyance Deed Due to Vendor Fraud. Limitation Period for Application Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Runs from Date of Instrument, Not from Date of Cancellation Deed.

17 May 2024

The appellant, a bona fide purchaser, agreed to buy property from Mohammed Hanif Ahmed Fitwala and prepared a conveyance deed. On 7 May 2014, the deed...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat Order in Banking Fraud Compensation Claim — Jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalat Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Raised Due to Alleged Criminal Misconduct by Third Parties. The dispute involved unauthorised online transfers from a bank account enabled by a duplicate SIM issued without consent, leading to claims for compensation and questions on the Lok Adalat's adjudicatory powers in fraud cases.

1 Jun 2026

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order of the Perm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Earlier View on Small Cause Court Jurisdiction — Holds That Investment Under Section 28 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 Does Not Confer Unlimited Pecuniary Jurisdiction. The court ruled that the pecuniary ceiling under Section 26 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 applies to courts invested with small cause powers under Section 28 of the 1869 Act, overruling Salimkhan v. Mohammad Ibrahimkhan.

5 Oct 2010

The case arose from a reference by a learned Single Judge (Shri B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) who disagreed with an earlier decision in Salimkhan v. Mohamma...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)