Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

54 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

19 Dec 2023

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MCOC Case Due to Invalid Extension Orders — Default Bail Granted. Extension of investigation period under Section 21(2)(b) of MCOC Act set aside for lack of Public Prosecutor's independent report and mechanical grant.

6 Jun 2023

The appellant, Darshan Subhash Nandagawali, was an accused in Crime No.357/2022 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Akola, for offences under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused Under MCOCA for Non-Compliance with Section 167(2) CrPC — Extension of Investigation Period Without Notice to Accused Invalid. The court held that the right to be heard before extension of investigation period is a fundamental facet of natural justice, and its violation entitles the accused to default bail.

3 Mar 2023

The petitioners, accused in a crime registered under Sections 307, 109 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, along with prov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Refusal of Sanction and Filing of Charge-Sheet After Expiry of Investigation Period. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and not defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet if the accused has already availed the right.

26 Mar 2024

The applicants, Dinesh Ganesh Indre and others, were arrested in connection with CR No. 497 of 2023 registered at Malad Police Station for offences un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Accused's Right to Default Bail in Pre-Charge Sheet Detention; Holds 60-Day Limit Applies Unless Offence Carries Minimum 10 Years' Imprisonment. Interpretation of 'imprisonment for a term not less than ten years' in Section 167(2) CrPC resolved in favor of personal liberty, entitling accused to statutory bail when charge sheet not filed within 60 days.

1 Jan 1970

The case arose from a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging orders of the Gauhati High Court rejecting bail to the petitioner. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Corruption Case Due to Expiry of 60-Day Detention Without Charge Sheet. Interpretation of 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' Under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Clarified; Bail Right Accrues on Expiry of Maximum Detention Period, Not Defeated by Later Filing of Charge Sheet.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed the right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case arising from a corruptio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in PC Act Case, Holds Detention Period of 60 Days Applies When Maximum Sentence is Not Explicitly at Least Ten Years. The Court Interprets 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' in Section 167(2) CrPC to Grant Default Bail When Charge Sheet Not Filed Within 60 Days.

1 Aug 2026

These Special Leave Petitions were preferred against the order of the Gauhati High Court dated 11.01.2017 rejecting the bail application of the petiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Default Bail and Cognizance in NDPS Case. Court’s Analysis Focuses on Maintainability Under Section 397 CrPC and Application of Precedents.

24 May 2021

The judgment of the High Court of Karnataka arises from two criminal revision petitions filed by the accused No.3, challenging the orders of the Speci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition Seeking Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC. Accused Challenges Order Rejecting Statutory Bail on Grounds of Non-Filing of Charge Sheet within 90 Days.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Comanduru Parthasarathy, an accused in Crime No.82 of 2021 registered by Seshadripuram Police Station for various offences under the I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application in Dacoity and Arms Act Case; Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Extinguished by Filing of Charge-Sheet, and Parity Claim Rejected Due to Criminal History and Active Role of Accused. The court held that the right to be released on default bail must be exercised before the charge-sheet is filed, and even a magistrate's failure to inform the accused does not revive the right.

6 Jul 2005

The applicant, Sajid Basir Shaikh, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 before the Bombay High Court. He wa...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)