Search Results for "rule made absolute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "rule made absolute"

11838 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11838 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

20 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

17 Feb 2016

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rescission of Appointment of Additional District Government Pleader Within 24 Hours. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Notification Violates Constitutional Prohibition Against Arbitrariness in Context of Pleasure Doctrine.

25 Nov 2025

The case concerns the abrupt withdrawal of an appointment as Additional District Government Pleader at the newly established XI Additional District an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Challenge to MPSC Procedural Rule on Wait-List in Judicial Service Recruitment. Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 Rule 6(3)(b) and Article 234 of the Constitution Examined.

16 Sep 2016

The Bombay High Court Division Bench heard a batch of writ petitions filed by candidates who had applied for the post of Civil Judge Junior Division a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

KAHC010138832018_1

14 Jan 2019

The judgment relates to a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notifications issued by the State Government's ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)