Search Results for "rule 10(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "rule 10(2)"

2077 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2077 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.

13 Dec 2024

The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

High Court

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

13 Mar 2026

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that the trial court did not err in rejecting application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling witnesses, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence sought to be adduced was not within their knowledge earlier.

14 Sep 2020

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the petitioners (defendants in th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Passes Judgment in Multiple Motor Accident Claim Appeals

22 Dec 2020

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal from High Court Order Granting Interim Custody of Vehicles in Criminal Misappropriation Case. Appellant Seeks Custody Based on Registration Certificates; Respondent Company Claims Possession Under Undertaking.

27 Jul 2026

The matter pertained to an appeal before the Supreme Court against a common order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh granting interim custody of seiz...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Notice of Motion for Interim Eviction of Non-Cooperating Members in Housing Society Redevelopment. The Court examines the Society's plea under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for mandatory orders against members who refuse to vacate despite a majority resolution.

28 Jul 2017

Background: The matter arises from a suit filed by Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a cooperative housing society registered under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against De-Freezing of Bank Accounts in Seizure Case Under Section 102(3) CrPC — Delayed Reporting to Magistrate Does Not Vitiate Seizure Order; Requirement is Directory, Not Mandatory.

13 May 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the first informant in Crime No.318 of 2022 against an order of the Madras High Court dated 09.08.2023, which ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)