Search Results for "retroactive amendment"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging TDS Provisions — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 194C, 194J, and 206AA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provisions are not arbitrary or discriminatory and that TRACES is a valid administrative mechanism.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by various assessees, including individuals and companies, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Not mentioned appeal in partition suit concerning rights of a remarried widow under Section 24 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The core legal question was whether the remarriage of the widow of a predeceased son prior to the opening of succession disqualifies her from inheritance.

The appeal arose from a decree in O.S.No.840/2001 on the file of I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, decreeing the suit for partiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Daughters Cannot Claim Share in Coparcenary Property Allotted to Father Before 20th December 2004. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not affect partitions effected prior to the amendment.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Interpretation of Provisos to Section 10A(2)(b) of MMDR Act in Writ Petitions. Prospecting Licence Holders Seek Mandamus for Execution of Mining Leases Pending Environmental Clearance.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a group of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by companies engaged in mining, seeking v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Sufficient Cause for Recalling Witness Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC

The petitioner, Channabasappa S/o Shivappa Hosamani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...