ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "restraining appointment"
550 result(s) found
Found 550 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Appointment Orders in Steel Plant Recruitment Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Passing Written Examination. No Indefeasible Right to Appointment Exists When Candidate Not Shown to Have Passed Examination and Records Destroyed Bona Fide.
7 May 2026The Supreme Court disposed of appeals by Appellants against the Calcutta High Court's judgment affirming the Central Administrative Tribunal's order d...
- 341
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
15 Apr 2026The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...
- 131
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Regularization Dispute Under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, Quashing High Court's Dismissal. Classification Excluding Academic Arrangement Appointees Under Section 3(b) Held Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, Entitling Appellants to Regularization Upon Fulfillment of Statutory Conditions.
9 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the appellants' challenge to their exclusion from regularization benefits under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special P...
- 603
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Directs Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Disabilities in Judicial Services Recruitment. The Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial services is unconstitutional and that PwBD candidates are entitled to relaxation of selection criteria under Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
10 Mar 2025The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition and connected matters, addressed the issue of recruitment of persons with disabilities (PwD) i...
- 905
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.
8 Dec 2021The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...
- 248
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees - Transfer Order Not Shown to Be Mala Fide or Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act. The court held that the union failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, as the transfer was a routine management decision.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.
2 Jul 2012The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Appointment as Reader in Deemed University. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right as Selection Committee Did Not Recommend Him for the Post.
15 Feb 2006The petitioner, Shripad Ganpati Bhat, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, incl...
- 142
