Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period. Reopening Based on Non-Escapement of Income as Assessee Had Already Disclosed Full Details During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Bajaj Energy Limited, a company engaged in energy business, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 on 30th November 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material Considered in Original Scrutiny Assessment is Invalid.

The petitioner, Clear Media (India) Private Limited, a company engaged in FM Radio Broadcasting, filed its return of income for the assessment year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of derivative transaction loss set aside as Assessing Officer had already examined the issue during original assessment.

The petitioner, Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF), through its Karta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Alliance Space Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in property development, challenged two notices dated 24th March 2015 and 29th March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act for Mere Change of Opinion. Assessment Completed Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a return for Assessment Year 2008-09 declaring income of Rs.20.33 lakhs, later revised to Rs.19.14 ...