Search Results for "registered shareholder"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "registered shareholder"

205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Dispute Over Maintainability of Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Nomination Under Section 72 of Companies Act, 2013 Vests Rights in Nominee, Excluding Legal Heirs from Claiming Shares for Petition Maintainability Under Sections 241 and 242.

6 Jul 2020

The dispute arose from a family tussle following the death of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, who held significant shares in Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Oswal Gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Technical Bid in Tender Process — Shareholding in Defaulter Company Not a Valid Ground for Disqualification Without Prior Notice or Opportunity. The court held that rejection of a bid based on past shareholding in a defaulter company, without giving an opportunity to explain, is arbitrary and unsustainable.

19 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Ganesh Vishal Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the respondent no.1, Mormugao Port Trust, rejecting its technica...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

22 Dec 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

24 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

11 Feb 2014

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Winding Up Petitions Under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Disputed Debts Require Trial and Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings. The court set aside the dismissal order and remanded for consideration of interim relief, directing the respondent to deposit the disputed amount or provide security.

7 Jan 2013

The appellants, Innovatherm GmbH and Electrification Charpente Levage SAS, filed winding up petitions under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability Under Section 10 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Directors Not In Charge of Day-to-Day Business at Relevant Time Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by directors and a company against criminal proceedings initiated under the Prevention of F...

Tribunals

NCLAT Sets Aside Impleadment Order in CIRP Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice — Corporate Debtor's Director Cannot Be Impleaded Without Notice Under Section 60(5) IBC. The order of impleadment was passed without prior notice to the Appellant, violating principles of natural justice, and was set aside with a remand for fresh consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai Bench, heard an appeal filed by Inkel Limited, represented by its Managing Director, agai...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)