Search Results for "rashness and negligence"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of ST Bus Driver. Principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur Applied as Bus Overturned on Wide Road Without Any Mechanical Defect.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased Virendra Joshi. The deceased die...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death in Motor Accident Case. Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present appeal was filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. by the original accused No.1, Sanjay Bhavrao @ Baburao Sapkal, challenging his conviction in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Death of Child in Truck Accident Not Sufficient to Prove Rashness Under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC r/w Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Uttam Akaram Madane by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vita, for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction of Driver in Rash Driving Death Case. Accused driver convicted under Sections 279 and 304A IPC for causing death of pedestrian due to rash and negligent driving; conviction under Section 134 r/w 187 MV Act also affirmed.

The revision petitioner, Kallappa S/o Bhimappa Sutagannavar, was the accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident on 17.05.2012 at about 2....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence by Tribunal. Claimant Proves Rash and Negligent Driving Through Panchanama and Witness Testimony Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Anant Sahadev Parsekar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.

The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The petitioner, Domnic Luis, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (...