Search Results for "quota"

430 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 430 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Cancelling Fair Price Shop License Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955. License Cancellation Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem Principle.

The petitioner, Dinesh Bansilal Agrawal, was a licensee of a fair price shop under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Minister of Food, Civil Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for MBBS Admission in State Quota. NEET-UG 2013 Rules Requiring SSC and HSC from Maharashtra Institution Are Valid and Not Ultra Vires Articles 14, 15, 21, 29(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shubham Gaddalay, a minor represented by his mother Dr. Sunanda Gaddalay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for Minority Quota Admissions. Clause 18(18) of Information Brochure requiring minority candidates to attach Domicile Certificate for CAP held valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 30 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Oslen A. Dsilva and another, claiming to be students belonging to minority communities, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Minority Institutions' Plea for 100% Management Quota in Professional Courses. Management quota for minority unaided professional institutions fixed at 50% upheld as reasonable under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.

The case involved three minority unaided professional institutions offering courses in Architecture, Pharmacy, and Management Sciences, established an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...