Search Results for "purchase notes"

489 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 489 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Complainant's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Material Witnesses Not Examined Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sayaji Dashrath Kawade, was serving as Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunications at Aurangabad. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Sahadev Parab, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Seized Vehicle Under Section 451 Cr.P.C. in NDPS Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interim Custody of Scorpio Car. Vehicle Not Required for Evidence, Continued Detention Causes Hardship; Release Ordered on Conditions Including Bank Guarantee and Undertaking.

The petitioner, J.R. Ravikumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging the orders dated 31.05.2019 passed by the III Addl. Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Admission of Winding-Up Petitions Under Companies Act, 1956 — Held That Company Court Has Discretion to Appoint Provisional Liquidator and That Appeal Against Admission Order Is Not Maintainable Under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of appeals filed by Vision Millennium Exports Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Company Court admitting winding-up petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Acquittal under Section 498A IPC in Husband-Wife Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and motive sufficient to convict for murder under Section 302 IPC, but cruelty charge not proved.

The appellant, Yogesh Dinesh Bharadwaj, was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.142 of 2004 for the murder o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Transferable Duty Free Licence. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of claim for damages based on alleged breach of warranty regarding transferability of advance licence.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...