Search Results for "provident fund contributions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "provident fund contributions"

211 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Setting Up' of Establishment Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952, Determining Whether Change of Ownership Creates New Establishment for Exemption Purposes. The Court Clarified the Test for Fresh Exemption Period When an Existing Business is Transferred to a New Owner.

17 Sep 1969

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Sugar Factory's Challenge Against EPF Appellate Tribunal Order on Damages Levy. Employer's Failure to Deposit Provident Fund Contributions Within Prescribed Time Attracts Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, But Quantum Must Be Proportionate and Not Arbitrary.

6 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPFAT and APFC Orders Levying Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act Due to Non-Speaking Order. APFC Mechanically Applied Maximum Damages Without Considering Employer's Written Objections, Contravening the Discretionary Nature of Para 32A.

3 Feb 2012

The petitioner, a distinct establishment initially treated as part of Asia Transport Company, had been remitting EPF contributions at 10% under that b...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

20 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Against Provident Fund Commissioner's Order — Contractors' Employees Held Entitled to Provident Fund Benefits Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Principal Employer Cannot Escape Liability for Provident Fund Contributions of Contractor's Employees Under Section 2(f) of EPF Act.

25 Mar 2015

The appellant, Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., a government corporation registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in promoting touri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Rights in Provident Fund Pension Scheme by Quashing Arbitrary Amendments. High Court's decision setting aside 2014 amendments to Employees' Pension Scheme as arbitrary and violative of Article 14 is considered, with reliance on R.C. Gupta holding no cut-off date for joint option under Clause 11(3).

24 Aug 2021

The dispute involved the Employees Provident Fund Organisation and employees regarding the interpretation of the Employees' Pension Scheme, particular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Employees' Contribution Deduction in Income Tax Case. Employees' contribution to PF/ESI/pension fund is deductible under Section 36(1)(va) only if paid before due date, not under Section 43B.

14 Oct 2014

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Pension Claim Against Fergusson College — Denial of Pension for Pre-1982 Service Set Aside. Court holds that pension cannot be denied for non-contributory service period under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as petitioner opted for pension and employer deducted contributions.

3 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Dr. Rajendra Shankar Mahamuni, a retired professor from Fergusson College, Pune, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 A...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.

21 Sep 2015

The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer Appeals in Provident Fund Damages Case — Upholds Levy of Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for Delayed Remittance. Mens Rea Not Essential for Levy of Damages Under Section 14B; Authority Has Discretion to Quantify Damages Based on Circumstances.

24 Jan 2013

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by several companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and othe...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)