Search Results for "prospective circular"

304 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 304 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Minimum Qualifying Marks in Recruitment Process. Amendment to Important Instruction Notified After Preliminary Exam Held Not Applicable to Ongoing Selection Where Interview Yet to Be Conducted.

The petitioners, Chiragkumar Dashratlal Patel and another, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Mandatory Lis Pendens Entry in 7/12 Extracts Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Resolution Not Recording Lis Pendens Upheld as No Express Statutory Provision Mandates Such Entry.

The two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court raised a common issue concerning the mandatory recording of lis pendens entries in land records, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...