Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Challenge to Transfer Orders in Education Service Dispute — Transfer Orders Set Aside for Violation of MEPS Act and Rules. Court held that transfer orders were passed without following mandatory procedure under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, and without affording opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 153
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by primary teachers employed in a school run by Talat Shikshan Mandal, a private educational institution. The petitioners challenged their transfer orders issued by the management on 16.04.2008 (in WP 5328/2008 and WP 5330/2008) and on 28.03.2009 (in WP 1958/2009). The petitioners contended that the transfers were effected without following the mandatory procedure under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the Rules framed thereunder, and without affording them any opportunity of hearing. The respondents, including the management and the education officers, opposed the petitions. The court examined the provisions of Section 5 of the MEPS Act and Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, which prescribe the procedure for transfer of employees in private aided schools. The court found that the management had not obtained prior approval of the Education Officer before issuing the transfer orders, and no notice or hearing was given to the petitioners. The court held that the transfer orders were illegal and void, being in violation of the statutory provisions and principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed all three writ petitions, set aside the impugned transfer orders, and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in their original posts. The court also directed the management to pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to each petitioner.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer of Teachers - Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rule 41 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - The petitioners, primary teachers in a private aided school, challenged their transfer orders passed by the management. The court held that the transfers were effected without following the mandatory procedure under the Act and Rules, and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The court set aside the transfer orders and directed the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in their original posts. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Transfer of Teachers - Section 5 of the MEPS Act, 1977 and Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, 1981 - The court examined the provisions of the Act and Rules and found that the management had not obtained prior approval of the Education Officer before effecting the transfers. The court held that such transfers are illegal and void. (Paras 5-8)

C) Service Law - Transfer of Teachers - Natural Justice - The court observed that the transfer orders were passed without giving any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, which is a violation of principles of natural justice. The court set aside the orders on this ground as well. (Paras 6-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned transfer orders passed by the respondent-management against the petitioners are legal and valid, and whether the petitioners are entitled to be continued in their original posts.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

All three writ petitions are allowed. The impugned transfer orders dated 16.04.2008 (in WP 5328/2008 and WP 5330/2008) and 28.03.2009 (in WP 1958/2009) are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioners to continue in their original posts. The respondent No.1 is directed to pay costs of Rs. 5,000 to each petitioner.

Law Points

  • Transfer of teachers in private aided schools must comply with Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act
  • 1977 and Rule 41 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules
  • 1981
  • Transfer orders without following prescribed procedure and without hearing the employee are illegal and liable to be set aside
  • The Education Officer has a duty to ensure compliance with the Act and Rules before approving transfers.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (12) 17

Writ Petition No.5328 of 2008, Writ Petition No.5330 of 2008, Writ Petition No.1958 of 2009

2015-12-23

S.S.Shinde, P.R.Bora

Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Mr. A.M.Karad, Mr. Dilip Patil Bankar, Mr. S.R.Yadav, Mr. E.G.Irale, Mr. U.B.Bondar

Smt. Sayada Mumtaz Jahan Sayad Ahteshamuddin, Smt. Parveen Sultana Abdul Gani, Smt. Sameena Kauser d/o. Sardar Fazal Mohd. Khan

Talat Shikshan Mandal, The Education Officer [Primary], Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, The Director of Education [Primary], Pune, The Education Officer [Secondary], Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging transfer orders of teachers in a private aided school.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the transfer orders and direction to allow them to continue in their original posts.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were transferred by the management without following the mandatory procedure under the MEPS Act and Rules, and without affording them an opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the transfer orders were passed in compliance with Section 5 of the MEPS Act, 1977 and Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, 1981? Whether the transfer orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the transfers were effected without prior approval of the Education Officer and without any notice or hearing, violating the Act and Rules. The respondents contended that the transfers were made in the interest of the institution and were valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of teachers in private aided schools must strictly comply with the procedure prescribed under Section 5 of the MEPS Act, 1977 and Rule 41 of the MEPS Rules, 1981, which require prior approval of the Education Officer and an opportunity of hearing to the affected employee. Any transfer order passed without following such procedure is illegal and void.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order of transfer dated 16.04.2008 at Exhibit-B. The impugned order of transfer dated 28.03.2009 at Exhibit-A. The transfers were effected without following the mandatory procedure under the Act and Rules, and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2008 and 2009 challenging transfer orders. The petitions were heard together and reserved on 14.12.2015, with judgment pronounced on 23.12.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: Section 5
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981: Rule 41
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Challenge to Transfer Orders in Education Service Dispute — Transfer Orders Set Aside for Violation of MEPS Act and Rules. Court held that transfer orders were passed without following mandatory procedure under Se...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Customs Act Case, Upholds Convictions for Smuggling Foreign Wrist Watches. Appellants Convicted Under Section 135(1)(b)(i) of Customs Act Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery Evidence