Search Results for "property tax recovery"

582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Property Tax Demands on Mobile Towers in Part. Conservancy Tax, Penalty, and Shasti on Illegal Constructions Quashed as Invalid Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act.

The petitioners, Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. and another, carry on business of providing infrastructure services including installation and ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...