Search Results for "priority disposal"

310 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Priority Disposal of Human Rights Complaint. Court Holds That High Court Cannot Direct State Human Rights Commission to Dispose of Case on Priority Basis Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Tr. Hussain Ahamed, filed a complaint before the Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission (SHRC Case No.14033 of 2022) and later appro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Army Officers' Challenge to Policy Change on Retention of Residential Accommodation During Study Leave. Policy change held to be reasonable and not arbitrary, as it applies uniformly to all officers and is based on administrative exigencies.

The petitioners, four Army officers (Lt. Col. Jitendra Ramchandra Manerikar, Lt. Col. Amar Nath Tripathi, Col. S. S. Jaglan, and Lt. Col. Atul Kishore...