Search Results for "pre-existing rights"

59 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit. Court holds that issues of limitation and cause of action are mixed questions of law and fact requiring trial under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications (CRA No. 12/2024 and CRA No. 13/2024) filed by defendants in a partition suit (RCS No. 78/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Lease Claimants in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Welfare Legislation Overrides Equitable Rights. High Court's Order Setting Aside HPC Decision and Allowing Redevelopment Upheld as Slum Act Takes Precedence Over Prospective Lessees' Claims.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal arising from a slum rehabilitation dispute in Mumbai. The appellants, legal representatives of Lullu Vas, claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...