Search Results for "possession transfer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession transfer"

3969 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3969 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Certificate Under Section 24 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is Evidence of Transfer, Not Certificate of Title. The court held that a certificate under Section 24 is merely evidence of transfer and does not confer title, thus the suit for possession without challenging the consolidation order was maintainable.

19 Sep 2019

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a civil suit for possession of agricultural land. The appellant (original ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Declares Transfer Void Under Section 531(1) of Companies Act, 1956 in Winding-Up Proceedings. Related party transaction without registered deed held to be fraudulent preference.

25 Jun 2026

The High Court of Bombay, in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, considered Official Liquidator Report No. 34 of 2025 in Company Petition No. 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Sale of Company Property During Winding Up as Null and Void. Transfer of Leasehold Rights Without Court Permission Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 Is Invalid.

5 Sep 2012

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the property of Hindustan Transmission Products Ltd. (HTPL), which was in liquidat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Tenancy Dispute, Upholding Protected Tenant's Ownership Rights. Oral Surrender of Protected Tenancy Rights Held Invalid Under Section 19 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, and Occupancy Rights Granted in 1982 Annulled as Ownership Had Already Vested in Protected Tenant Under Section 38-E from 1973.

1 Oct 2021

The dispute concerned conflicting claims over agricultural land between the legal heirs of a purchaser and a protected tenant. The purchaser's predece...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds First Appellate Court's Declaration of Unlawful Possession and Order for Vacant Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove tenancy rights and that the defendant's title by sale deed from mortgagee was valid, rejecting the plaintiff's claim of adverse possession.

5 Mar 2024

The case involves a property dispute over City Survey No. 2463 at Wai, Satara. The plaintiff, Ramesh Anandrao Shirke (since deceased, represented by l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.

7 Jul 2015

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Section 43 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — First Appellate Court Erred in Holding No Fraudulent Transfer Despite Unauthorized Sale Deed Execution. The court held that the principle of estoppel by deed under Section 43 applies when a person transfers property without title and subsequently acquires it, making the transfer valid.

10 Sep 2015

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The appellants are the legal representatives of the original defendant Mahadeo, and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Sales Tax/VAT Cases on Vehicle Hire Contracts, Finding No Transfer of Right to Use Goods. Contracts Where Contractor Retained Control, Maintenance Responsibility, and Risk Do Not Constitute Deemed Sale Under Article 366(29A)(d) of Constitution of India and Assam Tax Acts.

9 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered a group of appeals concerning tax liability under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 and Assam Value Added Tax Act, 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)