Search Results for "plaintiff's assertion"

784 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 784 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal Despite Unproven Part Payment. Failure to Prove Payment of Rs.300 Does Not Justify Refusal of Specific Performance When Plaintiff Shows Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6th June 1974, whereby the respondent-defendant agreed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals in Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Suit and Decreed Injunction; Plaintiff's Claim of Agreement to Sell and Possession Not Accepted, Subsequent Purchaser's Possession Protected.

The Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment dated 13.09.2005 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in two suits: O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Limitation Upheld. Adverse Possession Plea Fails as Defendant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Anjanabai Rajaram Gore, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit — Emphasizes Need for Brevity in Pleadings. The court allowed the defendants to defend the suit on condition of depositing a portion of the claimed amount, while deprecating prolix pleadings.

The applicant, JSW Steel Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against M/s. Paras Das Jain and Sons and two ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Allowing Counter-Claim in Property Suit. Amendment of Plaint After Issues Settled Constitutes Exceptional Circumstance Justifying Filing of Counter-Claim Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.

The petitioner, Vijaymala Sidling Doijad, filed a suit (Regular Civil Suit No.1056 of 2006) seeking injunction against the State of Maharashtra and th...