Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "pipeline project"
57 result(s) found
Found 57 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Housing Deficiency Case Against NCDRC Dismissal. Court Held NCDRC Erred in Dismissing Complaint Despite Finding Unfair Trade Practice and Failed to Properly Consider Statutory Obligations Under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 and Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
9 Feb 2023The appeal arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the order dated 21st August 2020 by the National Consumer Disputes...
- 478
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.
29 Jul 2019The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...
- 224
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court holds that arbitrator erred in rejecting claim for interest on delayed payment of compensation and in not awarding solatium under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
21 Mar 2018The petitioners, Kekobad Dossabhoy Doongriwalla and Khorshed Navzar Wadia, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Withholding of Payment Due to Complaints by Ex-Employee. Unilateral Withholding of Payment Without Contractual Authority or Opportunity of Hearing Violates Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution.
8 Sep 2017The petitioner, Mahimtura Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in consultancy engineering and project management, was awarded a contract by the Pi...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.
16 Oct 2012The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.
2 May 2012The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging CRZ Clearances for Coastal Road Project — Upholds Environmental Clearance Validity. Court holds that CRZ notifications and environmental clearances for the Mumbai Coastal Road Project are valid and not in violation of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 or the CRZ Notification, 2011.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Yeshwanth Shenoy challenging the environmental and CRZ clearances granted for the...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Buldana District — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. The Court held that the Reference Court erred in not considering potential value and comparable sale instances, and compensation was enhanced.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the purpose of construction of a percolation tank at vil...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Huts as Encroachments on Public Land. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right or title over the structures, which were unauthorized and constructed on land reserved for a garden.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by hutment dwellers in Vatsalatai Naik Nagar, Chembur, Mumbai, challenging the demolition of their hu...
- 91
