Search Results for "physical dispossession"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.

The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioner's Father Held Deemed Purchaser Under Section 32G of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Sale Deed Executed After Tillers Day Declared Void as Tenant Continued in Possession.

The dispute pertains to an agricultural land Survey No. 70/1 (New Gat No.199) in Village Sudawadi, Maval, Pune. The land was originally owned by Vitth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act — Suit Filed Beyond Limitation of Six Months. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Allowed as Plaint on Face Value Showed Suit Was Time-Barred.

The petitioners, Shri Anandraj S/o Khemraj Dhariwal and Smt. Santoshidevi wd/o Khemraj Dhariwal, filed a suit for restoration of possession under Sect...