Search Results for "pharmaceutical"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "pharmaceutical"

276 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 276 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

24 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversion from Contractual Higher Post to Substantive Lower Post. Officer holding substantive lower post cannot claim right to continue in higher contractual post after expiry of fixed tenure, as contractual appointment does not amount to promotion.

19 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Umesh V. Pawar, was initially appointed as a Junior Engineer (Civil) with M/s. Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd., a governm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Tender Process in Government Procurement Under National AYUSH Mission. The court held that paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the Operational Guidelines requires a transparent tendering process among eligible establishments, including IMPCL, Public Sector Undertakings, state government pharmacies, and cooperatives, to ensure competition and quality in the procurement of Ayurvedic medicines.

3 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a petition filed by Kerala Ayurvedic Co-operative Society Limited before the Lucknow Bench of the High Court of Judicature at A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'ZITA' Infringed by Defendants' Identical Mark. Court holds that registration of assignment with Trademarks Registry is not a prerequisite for filing suit; plaintiff's title to mark established through assignment deeds.

30 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit against G.R.A.F. Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and Valence Health Care for infringement of its reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

29 May 2013

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)