Search Results for "petroleum refinery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "petroleum refinery"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Entry Tax Case — Exemption Notification for Industrial Units Must Be Interpreted Broadly. The court held that the term 'component parts of goods manufactured' in the exemption notification includes raw materials and component parts used in the manufacture of finished products, and the assessee is entitled to exemption on the entry of such goods.

19 Nov 2015

The petitioner, M/s. JK Tyre & Industries Ltd. (formerly M/s. Vikrant Tyres Ltd.), is engaged in the manufacture and sale of automotive tyres, tubes, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Assessment Orders Under BST Act — Holds That Tribunal's Order Dated 20/01/2015 Has Prospective Effect Only. The assessing authority acted without jurisdiction in passing assessment orders for 2013-14 contrary to the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2015.

18 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Industries Ltd. and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction Under Section 16 and Order Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11; Alternative Remedies U/S 34 and Article 136 Must Be Availed. The court found that an order under Section 11 is challengeable only before the Supreme Court under Article 136, and a Section 16 order can be contested after the award under Section 34, thus barring writ jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2023

This writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government enterprise, and a joint ventu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. The court held that a notice under Section 148 issued after four years from the end of the assessment year is invalid if the reasons do not allege that the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.

14 Nov 2005

The petitioner, Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Limited, a public limited company engaged in running a petroleum refinery at Mangalore, filed a wr...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

High Court

KAHC010408942020_1

6 Sep 2022

The writ petition was filed by the management of a company engaged in the manufacture of industrial carbon and carbon brushes, classified as a hazardo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Pure Economic Loss Without Physical Damage — Claim for Production Loss Due to Vessel Grounding Held Not Maintainable in Tort of Negligence. Defendant Vessel Owner Not Liable as No Duty of Care Owed to Jetty Owner for Purely Economic Loss.

9 Jun 2014

The plaintiff, owner of a captive jetty and PVC resin plant, filed an admiralty suit against the defendant vessel, claiming production loss of Rs. 12,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Workman for Slapping Superior Officer in HPCL Case. Physical assault on superior constitutes grave misconduct warranting dismissal, and Tribunal's reduction of punishment to stoppage of one increment is perverse and shocks judicial conscience.

12 Apr 2024

The case involves cross petitions by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and its workman, Mavji Jethalal Rathod, challenging an Award dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition in Industrial Dispute Case Due to Proved Misconduct of Unauthorized Absence. The Court upheld the Labour Court's award rejecting reinstatement and back wages, finding no unfair labour practice or perversity in the findings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Chhatrasing Samsubhai Bilwal, was employed as a Junior Fireman with Indian Petrochemical Corporation Limited (IPCL), a public sector u...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)