Search Results for "permanent workers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "permanent workers"

614 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 614 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Disposes Common Judgment in 13 Writ Petitions Pertaining to Wrongful Non‑Regularization and Alleged Unfair Labour Practices. The Central Question Was Whether the Nagpur Municipal Corporation’s Conduct Toward Long‑Serving Safai Karmacharis Attracted Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and Entitled Them to Regularization Under the Model Standing Orders.

22 Dec 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 13 writ petitions arising from complaints under Section 28 of the Maharashtra R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Commissioner's Permission for Closure of Industrial Undertaking in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Review Application Maintainable Despite Expiry of One-Year Bar Under Section 25-O(4). The court held that a review application is not a fresh application under Section 25-O(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and can be entertained after the rejection of the original closure application, especially when permanent workmen have settled their claims.

12 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Krantikari Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, challenged the order dated 27 January 2015 passed by the Labour Commissioner (Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contract Workmen's Wage Parity Claim Against Principal Employer. Existence of Agreement with Representative Union Precludes Non-Members from Claiming Higher Wages Under Contract Labour Act.

20 Apr 2023

The petition was filed by Mumbai Electric Employees Union, a non-representative union of contract workmen, challenging the order of the Additional Lab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Settlement Signed with Minority Workers, Upholds Company's Right to Enter into Settlement Under Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Settlement signed with 9 workers on a holiday is valid as it was signed in the presence of Conciliation Officer and no fraud or coercion was proved.

24 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by Hindustan Lever Employees Union challenging a settlement signed by Hindustan Unilever Limited with 9 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Holding Unrecognised Union Cannot Maintain Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court ruled that only a recognised union has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 for items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

18 Dec 2015

The case involves an appeal by Ballarpur Industries Limited (appellant) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Illegal Retrenchment. Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Void, and Full Back Wages Are the Normal Rule.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd. and another against 27 workmen challenging the award of the Labour Court, K...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)