Search Results for "pension denial"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "pension denial"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Navy Pension Regulation Denying Condonation for Voluntary Discharge. Regulation 82(a) of Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 21, 300A as it applies uniformly to sailors discharged at their own request.

22 Nov 2006

The petitioners, six former sailors of the Indian Navy, were discharged from service on compassionate grounds. They had served between 14 and 15 years...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pensioners' Suit as Barred by Limitation in Pension Reduction Dispute. Court holds that cause of action for challenging reduction in pension percentage arose in 2002 when the reduction was first communicated, and the suit filed in 2012 is time-barred under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

11 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, ABN AMRO Bank Mumbai Pensioners Association, filed a suit against The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly ABN AMRO Bank NV) seeking dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim in Service Law Dispute — Suspension Period Counted as Qualifying Service Under CCS Pension Rules. Rule 23 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 read with Office Memorandum dated 28.02.1976 mandates that suspension period not expressly excluded by order must be treated as qualifying service.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Sahadev Rama Gadling, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the denial of pension by the re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Minimum Pension of Rs.375 to Pre-1986 Pensioner Absorbed in Public Sector Undertaking. Petitioner entitled to minimum pension under Clause 7.1 read with Clause 10(a) of Office Memorandum dated 16.04.1987 despite having drawn lump sum terminal benefits.

10 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Anthony C. Monteiro, was a government servant in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Goa, as a Junior Stenogra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Deceased Employee's Legal Heirs in Delhi Transport Corporation Case — Resignation After 30 Years of Service Does Not Forfeit Pension Under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. Employee's Long Service and Liberal Construction of Resignation Letter Entitle Him to Pension and Other Retiral Benefits Despite Resignation.

9 Dec 2025

The case involves an appeal by the legal heirs of Appellants, a deceased employee of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), against the denial of pensiona...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Invalidity Pension Under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 — Employee Suffering Total and Permanent Disablement Due to Accident Entitled to Pension Despite Not Being in Service at Time of Application. The Court held that the condition of being in service at the time of application is not a precondition for invalidity pension under Section 16 of the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, as the disablement occurred while the employee was in service.

23 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Avinash Anant Vaidya, was employed as a Sales Manager with M/s Kopran Limited since 1995. He had a touring job and would travel across...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge Against Denial of Pension to Assistant Teacher Who Resigned After Nearly 20 Years. Resignation Under Rule 40 of MEPS Rules Forfeited Past Service, and Claim Barred by 30-Year Delay and Ineligibility for Voluntary Retirement Under Rule 66 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

29 Jul 2022

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed by the legal heirs of Bhagwanrao Anantrao Chate, a former assistant teacher in a private school, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Municipal Employees' Petitions for Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right, and Denial Without Proper Notice or Opportunity Violates Natural Justice. The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to consider representations of retired employees for pension and pass reasoned orders after hearing them.

17 Mar 2018

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking pensionary benefits...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that aided non-government educational institutions are bound to adopt government pension scheme for employees who retired after the cut-off date.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioners, thirteen retired employees of Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic, Amravati (respondent No.4), which is run by Shivaji Education Socie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Employee Transferred from Government Institute to Government Company. Holds That Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Transfer Without Option to Retain Government Pension Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

4 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Prakash Parshuram Mavlankar, was employed with the erstwhile Haffkine Institute, a government entity under the State of Maharashtra, f...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)