Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

413 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 413 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part — NCCD Payable Despite Excise Duty Exemption, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable. The Court held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, being surcharges on excise duty, cannot be levied when basic excise duty is exempted, but NCCD, being an independent duty of excise, is payable.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (the appellant) and the Union of India regarding the liability to pay National Calamity Con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Concerning Denial of Waiver Benefits under Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017. Petitioners challenged endorsements rejecting claims for waiver of penalty and interest under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

14 Nov 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

13 Oct 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)