Search Results for "penalty review"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "penalty review"

980 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 980 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

8 Apr 2026

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by State Power Entities Against APTEL Order Deleting Misdeclaration Penalty. Penalty for Misdeclaration of Declared Capacity Requires Proof of Intent or Negligence Under Punjab State Grid Code Regulations.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves appeals by Punjab State Load Despatch Centre (PSLDC) and Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) against the judgment of the ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024

9 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Student's Challenge to Expulsion for Sexual Harassment — Procedural Defects Cured by Appeal Process. Expulsion Upheld as Proportionate Under UGC Regulations 2015 for Repeated Misconduct Despite Humanitarian Considerations.

10 Oct 2024

The petitioner, a student of Maharashtra National Law University (MNLU), was expelled after an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) found him guilty of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

12 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for TCS in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as reasons recorded were based on same material considered during original assessment, constituting mere change of opinion.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged a notice dated 31st March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Minor Penalty on Government Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Unauthorized Absence. Withholding of One Increment for Two Years Held Proportional Under Rule 11(iv) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

28 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Mr. Hanamatrao M. Kulkarni, was a Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, recruited in 1983. He...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record in Order Granting Time to Pay Deficit Stamp Duty. Review Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Ground Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC for Recall of Judgment.

14 Sep 2021

The Review Petition No.340 of 2019 was filed by Seetharama Shetty (the petitioner/plaintiff) seeking recall of the judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Death Sentence in Rape and Murder of Two Children. Conviction Under Sections 302, 376(2)(f),(g) and 201 IPC Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

7 Nov 2019

The review petitions were filed by Manoharan, the sole surviving accused, against the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 01.08.2019 which affirmed hi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Death Sentence Case for Murder of Wife and Four Children — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Article 137 and Order XL Rule 10 of Supreme Court Rules, 1966 cannot be used to re-appreciate evidence; only errors apparent on face of record can be corrected.

1 Oct 2019

The review petition was filed by Sudam @ Rahul Kaniram Jadhav against the final judgment and order dated 04.07.2011 of the Supreme Court in Criminal A...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)