Search Results for "pedestrian injury"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 304(A) and 279 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Rash or Negligent Driving Causing Death.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Bashir Janubhai Pathan, who was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Pathardi, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider. Insurer Liable as Policy Covered Pillion Rider Risk Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Co., Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 05.02.2011 passed by the II Additional District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Reduces Interest Rate in Motor Accident Claim. Claimant's compensation of Rs.19,08,550 upheld but interest reduced from 9% to 7.5% per annum under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2011 when the claimant, a pedestrian, was hit by a tanker bearing registration No. GJ-6-V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier. Tribunal's Award Modified Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 01.01.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Bhavnagar, in Motor Acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...