Search Results for "occupancy"

616 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights to Respondents 3 and 4 Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Adverse Possession.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives) challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord’s Appeal in Bihar Tenancy Dispute; Thika Patta Held to be Lease, Not Mortgage. Tenants of a Tenure-Holder, Being Settled Raiyats Under Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, Acquired Occupancy Rights and Could Not Be Evicted After Expiry of Head Lease.

The dispute arose from a thika patta executed by the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff (appellant) in favor of B, covering a village for a term...