Search Results for "no recovery"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Not Based on Next Promotional Post.

The dispute arose from a challenge by the Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi, and another against a High Court order that granted grade p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Criminal Antecedents. The High Court's orders granting bail were cryptic and did not consider the gravity of the offence or the criminal antecedents of the accused.

The appeals were filed by the informant-appellant, the mother of the deceased Rupesh Kumar, challenging the orders dated 22.07.2021 and 13.09.2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder with Common Intention Under Section 302/34 IPC. Exhortation by Lathi-Bearing Accused Sufficient to Attract Section 34.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Gulab, upholding his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in NDPS Case: Conviction for Possession of 900 gm Smack Upheld Despite Procedural Challenges. Chance recovery from vehicle under Section 43 NDPS Act does not require compliance with Section 50, and police testimony alone can sustain conviction.

The appellant, Kallu Khan, was convicted under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Due to Tribunal's Excessive Interference. Tribunal Erred by Applying Criminal Standard of Proof and Revisiting Evidence De Novo Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a workman, R.C. Srivastava, by Standard Chartered Bank following a domestic enquiry into allegations of miscon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensee in Excise License Cancellation Case Due to Inapplicability of Amended Rules. Liability Limited to Actual Loss with Credit for Departmental Management Fees Under Old Rule 13 of Abkari Shops Departmental Management Rules, 1972, as Contract Predated Amendment.

The dispute arose from the cancellation of a country liquor license by the State of Kerala. The respondent licensee had successfully bid for arrack sh...