Search Results for "negligence defense"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite FIR and Panchnama Showing Involvement of Offending Vehicle.

The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, being...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal erred in dismissing claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite FIR, panchnama, and eyewitness testimony establishing involvement of offending vehicle.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Pay and Recover Order Despite Driver Being Minor Without License. Third Party Claimants Entitled to Compensation; Insurer to Recover from Owner Who Knew of Lack of License.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the legal heirs of a deceased person ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Barbed Fencing with Electric Current Not Proved to be Rash or Negligent Act Under Section 304-A IPC.

The appellant, Jagannatha @ Muniyappa, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural District, in Spl.C. No.102/2006 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved, Compensation Enhanced for Loss of Future Earnings Due to Permanent Disability.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Babanna H. @ Babu, a loader, was injured on 20.03.2013 when the tract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Deceased's Dependents. Negligence of Driver and Insurer's Liability Affirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the dependents of Manju Naik, who died in a collision between two tractors. The claimant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.4,10,000 for Death of Lorry Owner. Negligence of Driver Proved; Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Manju Naik, who died in a road accident on 19-04-2010. The ...