CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "managing agents"
232 result(s) found
Found 232 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in MOU Dispute Between Developer and Public Trust. Arbitration Clause in MOU dated 16 June 2011 Held Valid and Binding Despite Non-Formation of Special Purpose Entity.
12 Jan 2024The petitioner, M/s. Devike Constructions and Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.
1 Nov 2023The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Petitioners Fail to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 was valid and the challenge was barred by delay and laches.
13 Apr 2023The petitioners, who are agriculturists from various villages in Gangapur taluka, Aurangabad district, filed two writ petitions challenging the acquis...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.
22 Mar 2022The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.
11 Feb 2022The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...
- 33
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.
22 Jul 2020The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...
- 169
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.
3 Oct 2019The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to...
- 198
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 300
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability of Partners and Employees. Partners and employees not shown to be in charge of or responsible for conduct of business at time of offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
10 Jul 2007The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the applicants (accused) seeking quashing...
- 102
