Search Results for "life imprisonment without remission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "life imprisonment without remission"

170 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Single Conviction for Multiple Cheque Dishonours — Default Sentences Ordered Consecutively. Each cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is a distinct offence, and default sentences under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can run consecutively.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Cyrus Noshirwan Kartak, was a director of Mintaur Engineering Private Ltd. The respondent-complainant sold and delivered goods to the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case Based on Beneficial Interpretation of Remission Policy. The court held that the petitioners, convicted for murder, should be placed in category 3(b) (22 years) rather than category 5(b) (26 years) of the 2010 remission guidelines as the motive of political rivalry was not established for all accused.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case: Petitioners Re-categorized from Category 5(b) to 3(b) Under 2010 Remission Policy. The court held that the motive of political rivalry was not established for all petitioners and the incident occurred without premeditation, thus they should be placed in Category 3(b) (22 years) rather than Category 5(b) (26 years) under the 2010 Remission Policy.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Remission and Concurrent Sentences. The Court upheld the High Court's writ of habeas corpus, finding that a convict's continued detention after remission of a life sentence was illegal as his separate one-year sentence for kidnapping ran concurrently under Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and he had already served it.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with an appeal by the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging a High Court order that issued a writ of habeas corpus directing the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Writ Petition for Premature Release Consideration Under 2018 Policy Despite Subsequent Amendment. Court Holds That Policy Prevalent at Time of Conviction Governs Remission Consideration and Directs State to Re-examine Arbitrary Age Restriction in 2021 Policy.

31 Jan 2022

The petitioner, convicted for offences under Section 302/307/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated 30.9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Life Convict's Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Remission for Parole Overstay. Superintendent's Order Quashed for Non-Consideration of Explanation, Violating Natural Justice.

17 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Sandeep S/o Kisan Khadse, a life convict sentenced on 31.01.2003, was released on furlough leave on 16.02.2008 for 30 days. He oversta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

3 Oct 2019

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Review Petition Allowed in Open Court. Court Holds That Life Imprisonment Is the Rule and Death Sentence an Exception, and Mitigating Circumstances Must Be Considered Even in Heinous Crimes.

14 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by Md. Mannan @ Abdul Mannan, who had been convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Double Murder Case — Accused Killed Wife and Daughter Due to Suspected Infidelity and Financial Stress, but Case Does Not Fall in 'Rarest of Rare' Category. The court held that mitigating circumstances such as lack of premeditation, mental stress, and socio-economic background outweighed the aggravating factors, commuting death to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

20 Feb 2015

The case arises from a brutal double murder where the accused, Chandrakant Vasant Ayare, killed his wife Sanchita and their minor daughter Vaishnavi b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Remission Order in TADA Case — State Government Directed to Reconsider Without Fixing 30-Year Cap. Remission under Section 432 CrPC cannot be conditioned on a fixed term of 30 years for life convicts under TADA.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Ravindra Shantaram Sawant, was convicted in TADA Special Case No.31/1994 by the Designated Court for offences under Sections 3(2)(ii),...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)