Search Results for "industrial drawings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "industrial drawings"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Commercial Complex Under PPP Due to Abuse of Process and Local Body Exemption. Construction by Municipal Corporation on Its Own Land Under PPP Exempt from Planning Permission Under Section 44 MRTP Act, and Delegation of Powers by Commissioner Under Section 72B Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Valid.

12 Feb 2016

The petitioner, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a commercial complex named Ranjeet Singh Market an...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

1 Apr 2015

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Naval Dockyard Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on extra work and escalation claims as plausible and not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.

25 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

19 Nov 2010

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Debarment Order in Transformer Supply Contract Dispute — Modification of Debarment Period Upheld but Effective Date Changed. The High Court's modification of the debarment effective date from 30.07.2020 to 13.02.2020 was upheld as within its discretion, and no interference was warranted.

13 Dec 2021

The appellant, a proprietorship firm engaged in manufacturing and repairing transformers, had been supplying to Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut V...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

9 Nov 2023

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim for Weighted Deduction Under Section 35B of Income Tax Act — Subcontractor Not Entitled to Export Markets Development Allowance for Services Rendered to Indian Main Contractor. The court held that the assessee, as a subcontractor to an Indian company, did not incur expenditure for its own export business and thus could not claim weighted deduction under Section 35B.

13 Oct 2016

The case involves an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment year 1979-80. The assessee, Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Proprietorship Firm and IIT Dharwad. Arbitration clause invoked under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes arising from contract dated 10.04.2018.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioner, M/S. Suresh Goel & Associates, a proprietorship concern, filed a petition under Section 11(5)(6) and 12(b) of the Arbitration and Conc...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)