Search Results for "impounded document"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Against Delegation of Stamp Duty Calculation by Civil Judge. Delegation of duty under Section 33 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 by a Judge other than High Court Judge is invalid.

The case involves a challenge by the defendant (petitioner) against an interlocutory order dated 02.08.2016 passed by the Court of the Additional City...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Passport in Criminal Case — Petitioner Granted Custody of Passport Subject to Conditions to Ensure Court Attendance. Passport Release Ordered Under Section 482 CrPC with Safeguards Against Absconding.

The petitioner, Sri Praveen Surendiran, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Recall Document for Evidence in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Recall of Document from Collector's Office for Purpose of Tendering in Evidence

The petitioner, Shri Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a housing society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31-1-2012 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Holding Registered Sale Deeds Inadmissible for Want of Stamp Duty. Documents Executed by Maharaja of Mysore Are Exempt from Stamp Duty Under Article 294 of the Constitution of India, and Therefore Cannot Be Rejected as Inadmissible.

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S.No.1963/2002 seeking a possessory decree, challenged the order dated 21.07.2017 passed by the XXXI Addl. City Civil J...