Search Results for "illegal mining penalty"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Deletion of Additions for Bogus Transportation, Illegal Mining, and Helicopter Expenses. The Court Examines Whether the ITAT's Deletions Were Perverse and Whether Cross-Examination Rights Were Adequately Protected Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, which partly allowed the assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Quashing Suspension of Tahsildar. Government Resolution Waiving Penalty for Illegal Mining Was Stayed at Time of Tribunal Order, But Suspension Set Aside on Grounds of No Prima Facie Case.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging a common judgment and order dated 24-11-2023 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...