Search Results for "guardianship"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of Grandparents' Custody of 7-Year-Old Child. Protecting the Psychological Well-being of a Child in Custody Disputes

Appeal filed against a judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the custody of a minor child. The High Court had ruled in favor of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Unwed Mother's Petition for Birth Certificate Without Father's Name. Right to Privacy Under Article 21 Protects Unwed Mother's Decision to Not Disclose Father's Name in Birth Certificate Under Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.

The petitioner, an unmarried woman, delivered a female child on 7 November 2014. She filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Truck Driver Established by Evidence. Claimant entitled to compensation as rash and negligent driving proved by oral and documentary evidence, including FIR and panchnama.

The appellant, Ruchita Ganesh Kolambkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries s...