Search Results for "fine reduction"

233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.

The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC to Proceed with Dismissal of Convicted Employee Despite Pending Criminal Appeal. Suspension of Sentence Does Not Stay Conviction Under Regulation 39(4) of LIC (Staff) Regulations 1960.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court Division Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Reducing Redemption Fine and Penalty Without Reasons. Tribunal's reliance on non-binding precedent from another bench held improper as it ignored its own earlier order.

The Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, Excise and...