Search Results for "excise penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "excise penalty"

514 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

Supreme Court

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

28 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.

5 Dec 2022

The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Cognizance in Bihar Excise Case — Private Vehicle Not a Public Place Under Section 53(a) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. Consumption of liquor in a private vehicle does not constitute an offence under Section 53(a) as the vehicle is not a 'public place' under the Act.

10 May 2019

The appellants, all Rotarians, were travelling from Giridih, Jharkhand to Patna, Bihar in a private vehicle to attend a Rotary Club meeting on 25.06.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 580...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

13 Oct 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)