Search Results for "excess salary recovery"

200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Excess Pay for Over Five Years Without Employee's Fault Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of the Constitution, Applying Rafiq Masih.

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working under the Subordinate Judge, Tirukoilur, challenging an office order for recovery of excess pay a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter — Recovery of Excess Pay Set Aside Despite Pay Revision Confirmed. Employee's Excess Pay Recovery Set Aside as Employer Error Without Misrepresentation, Applying Rafiq Masih Principles.

The writ petition was filed by A. Shenbagavalli, an employee of the subordinate judiciary in Tamil Nadu, who was appointed as a Copyist on 13.01.1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Employee. Recovery of Excess Salary Barred as per Rafiq Masih Principles Due to Long Delay and Hardship, but Re-fixation of Pay Permitted under Applicable Rules.

The writ petition was filed by a retired judicial employee against the Sub-Judge, Principal District Judge, and the Registrar General of the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Retired Government Employee. Recovery of excess payment made after retirement causes hardship and is not sustainable.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Deputy Director of Health Services and the Block Medical Officer against an order of a single judge setti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery Order Against Retired Teacher -- Pensionary Benefits Ordered to Be Released Under Article 226 and Supreme Court Guidelines

The petitioner, a retired teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash an order dated 08.06.2007 that direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reversion Orders of APMC Employees for Violation of Natural Justice and CCA Rules. Orders passed without show cause notice and without affording opportunity of hearing set aside as illegal and arbitrary.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging orders of reversion pa...