Search Results for "energy companies"

388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director Convicted for Electricity Theft — Acquittal Restored Due to Lack of Evidence of Personal Involvement. Vicarious liability under Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 cannot be imposed without proof of direct participation or knowledge of tampering.

The appellant, Mahaveer, was a director of M/s Rushi Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd., a company in Jalana, Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Electricity ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in Jurisdictional Dispute Over Trial of IBC Offences. Held that Reference to Special Court under Chapter XXVIII of Companies Act, 2013 in Section 236(1) IBC is Legislation by Incorporation, Not Affected by Subsequent Amendment.

The appeal arises from a challenge by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Haryana Utilities Against APTEL Order on Tariff Revision for Adani Power. Court upholds CERC's power to grant compensatory tariff under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 due to change in law and force majeure events.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 3rd November 2020, which dismissed the appeal filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Winding Up Petition to NCLT Despite Admission Order. Discretion Under Section 434(1)(c) Companies Act, 2013 Properly Exercised Where Liquidation Was at Initial Stage and No Irreversible Steps Taken.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. against the Delhi High Court's order transferring a winding up petition to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in FPSO Charter Hire Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of counterclaims, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the award.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...