WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013
1 Oct 2014The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...
Search Results for "enabling proviso"
844 result(s) found
Found 844 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).
28 Apr 2021The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.
14 Jun 2019The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...
- 169
High Court
High Court of Bombay Addresses Divergence on Reservation Act and Promotion Policy — Constitutional Validity Issue Deemed Academic. Third Judge Holds that Tribunal Overstepped in Striking Down Reservation Act as the Core Dispute Concerned Promotion Quotas, Not Direct Recruitment Reservations.
25 Jul 2017The matter originated from a reference by the Chief Justice under Rule 7, Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, necessitated by a d...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Municipal Standing Committee Resolution — Proportional Representation Mandated. Court quashes resolution dated 20.03.2012 determining strength of political groups on Standing Committee of Akola Municipal Corporation for not following single transferable vote method under Section 31(2) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
8 May 2012The petitioner, Mahanagar Sudhar Samiti, a political group in the Akola Municipal Corporation, challenged a resolution passed by the General Body on 2...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Dispute Over Dishonoured Cheque — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Liability of Guarantors. Court sets aside summary judgment and grants unconditional leave to defend, holding that the appellants raised triable issues including whether the loan was repaid and whether the guarantors were discharged.
17 Dec 2016The case arises from a summary suit filed by Anthony Maharaj (respondent) against Morpheus Media Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and others (appellants) for recove...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal's Denial of Relaxation in Promotion to SC/ST Employees. Constitutional Amendment Allowing Lower Qualifying Marks for SC/ST in Promotions Held to Take Effect from Date of Presidential Assent, Not from Date of Office Memorandum.
28 Feb 2017The writ petition arose from a challenge to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Mumbai, which dismissed Original Application No.586...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.
5 Aug 2016The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Bombay Grants Direction Dispensing with Section 101(2) Procedure in Reduction of Share Capital – Interpretation of 'Any Other Case' under Section 101(2) and Discretion of Court. The court held that where reduction does not involve diminution of liability in respect of unpaid share capital or payment to shareholders, Section 101(2) does not automatically apply, and the court has discretion to dispense with creditor objection procedure under Section 101(3) in special circumstances.
10 Feb 2005The applicant, Rallis India Limited, a public limited company, had merged four loss-making subsidiaries, resulting in an accumulated debit balance of ...
- 12
High Court
- 28
