Search Results for "employee grievance"

1628 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1628 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal by Corporation, Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employee for Refusing Transfer. Employer's Right to Transfer Employee is a Fundamental Management Prerogative and Refusal Constitutes Misconduct Justifying Dismissal.

The case involves an intra-court appeal by the Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited against an order of a learned Single Judge dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order. Industrial Court Erred in Permitting De Novo Enquiry Without Employer Reserving Right in Written Statement as Per Supreme Court Precedent.

This writ petition arises from an industrial dispute where the petitioner-employee, a sweeper with the Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Case. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Statutory Notice Period Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya (the Management), challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the School Tribunal, Latur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher with 60% Back Wages. Inquiry Committee Not Properly Constituted Under MEPS Act Rules, Dismissal Set Aside.

The petitioner, Trustees of Swati Education Trust, runs Smt. J.B. Khot High School, a recognized school. The respondent No. 1, Meenaxi Prasade, was ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Departmental Inquiry Against Headmaster Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Alleged Procedural Violations Including Defective Inquiry Committee and Denial of Statement of Allegations Examined.

The petitioner, a Headmaster of a private school governed by the MEPS Act and Rules, challenged his termination following a departmental inquiry. The ...