Search Results for "employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employee"

7023 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7023 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Dependants' Benefit for Deceased Worker Despite Wage Limit. Deceased Balram held to be an employee under Section 2(9) of ESI Act as wages were calculated per day and did not exceed Rs.1000 per month.

13 Jan 2005

The case involves an appeal by the Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation against an order of the ESI Court granting dependan...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petitions Challenging School Tribunal’s Orders of Reinstatement Under Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Temporary Appointments in Clear Vacancies Attract Probation and Deemed Confirmation Unless Proved Otherwise.

13 Oct 2006

These two writ petitions were filed by the employer-management before the Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay, challenging separate orders of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award for Non-Seasonal Employees in Ginning Factory. Employees working as Wireman and Press Driver held entitled to gratuity at fifteen days' wages per year under Section 4(2) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, not seven days per season.

20 Apr 2017

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Madhaodas Jankidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory (the employer) challenging orders of the Controlli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Employer's Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Injury After Work Hours Not in Course of Employment. The court held that an accident occurring after the workman had left the workplace and outside working hours does not arise out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, reversing the Commissioner's award.

12 Dec 2025

The appellant, Ganesha, proprietor of Ganesha Engineering Works, challenged the judgment and award dated 29.11.2021 passed by the Senior Civil Judge a...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Employee Compensation Case - Assault by Employer Not Compensable Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as It Does Not Constitute an 'Accident'

4 Feb 2026

The appellants, legal representatives of Swamy, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their compensation claim under the Employee's Compensation Ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Employer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Employer Not Liable for Employee's Personal Errand. The Court held that the employer cannot be held vicariously liable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the employee was not acting in the course of employment at the time of the accident.

15 Jul 2021

The appeal was filed by M/s. ARRK Tooling Sermo India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly Perfect Moulds Ltd.) challenging the judgment and award dated 21.07.2010 in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Petitioner failed to establish employer-employee relationship with respondent company as he was engaged through a contractor.

23 Mar 2005

The petitioner, M.G. Bhide, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Pune under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Full Back Wages. Termination of Employee Held to be Voluntary Resignation Based on Relieving Letter and Absence of Coercion.

1 Dec 2023

The petitioners, M/s. S.K.International (a partnership firm) and its partner Chirag Kenia, challenged an Award dated 12 July 2022 passed by the Labour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

26 Aug 2010

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Was Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Transfer Order Not Challenged on Merits. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the petitioner, including supervision and administrative functions, excluded him from the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Tale, along with 19 other employees, filed a complaint of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)