Search Results for "dowry allegations"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry. Conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death.

The appellant, Motiram s/o Kisan Shende, was convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Section 498A IPC Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Cruelty and Dowry Demand. Conviction set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry shortly before her death.

The appellants, Nizar Razzakali Panjwani, Nadir Razzakali Panjwani (expired), Roshanbhai Razzakali Panjwani (expired), and Parwin Nadir Panjwani, were...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand. Dying Declaration Did Not Mention Dowry Demand, and Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty Soon Before Death Under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents (accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 50/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty Soon Before Death. Demand for Dowry Not Proved as Material Omissions in Witness Statements Amount to Contradictions Under Section 162 CrPC.

The appellant, Karan Singh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the dow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Prohibition Act Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petition under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC allowed as FIR under Sections 498-A IPC and 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 did not disclose essential ingredients of dowry demand.

The petitioner, Vinod Suryawanshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of ...