Search Results for "district consumer commission"

432 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Consumer Appeal Dismissed in Default Due to Advocate's Absence. State Commission Lacks Power to Recall DID Order; High Court Exercises Writ Jurisdiction to Set Aside Order and Restore Appeal for Fresh Hearing on Merits.

The petitioner, Arun Modale, had filed a First Appeal No. 481/2009 before the Maharashtra State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (State Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Disposes of Second Appeals by Government Department in Consumer Disputes. Delay Condoned and Appeals Heard Together Due to Similarity of Facts and Issues.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, dealt with two second appeals filed by the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Delay in Filing Process Caused by Court Closures and Advocate's Inability to Present Envelopes Held to Be Sufficient Ground for Restoration.

The petitioner, Deepak Sharma, filed a consumer complaint (Case No. 153/2021) before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-First...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Full Compensation in Bank Deficiency of Service Case — Insurance Claim Denied Due to Bank's Failure to Forward Premium. Concurrent findings of deficiency of service upheld; reduction of compensation from Rs 5 lakhs to Rs 2 lakhs by NCDRC set aside.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 25 October 2018, which reduced the compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seed Company, Upholds Consumer Status of Small Agriculturist in Buyback Dispute. Cultivation of Safed Musli for Livelihood Held Not Commercial Purpose Under Section 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves a dispute between M/s Nandan Biomatrix Ltd., a seed company, and S. Ambika Devi, a small landholder. In 2003, the appellant advertis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Case — State Commission Failed to Consider Compensation Amount. Compensation of Rs. 3,000 per day from 15.06.2021 till payment was not considered by State Commission in Appeal No. 129 of 2023.

The case involves an appeal by Manoj Kumar against TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. and three others. The dispute arose from a complaint filed ...