Search Results for "discriminatory standards"

292 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes 'Not Suitable' Declaration for Judicial Post Candidate Due to Non-Application of Mind and Arbitrariness. MPSC's Rejection of Candidate Based on Vague Grounds of 'Unsuitable' Without Specific Reasons Violates Article 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Shobhit Gaur, a law graduate from Bhartiya Vidyapeeth, Pune, enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2010 and practic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Constitutional Validity of UGC Regulations Mandating NET/SLET as Minimum Qualification for Lecturer Appointments. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Whether Regulation is Prospective and Intra Vires UGC Act Addressed.

The case involved a batch of appeals before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...