High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "devotees rights"
70 result(s) found
Found 70 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Government Order Appointing Non-Hereditary Trustees to Religious Math in Violation of Section 18 of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997. Hereditary trustees' rights upheld; appointment set aside for non-compliance with statutory procedure.
23 Jan 2024The petitioners, Shree Ramachandrapura Math and its Peetadhipathi, challenged the order dated 12.07.2023 passed by the State of Karnataka appointing n...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple Structure at Vaidya Wadi. Court holds that the structure was not a protected monument and the petitioners lacked locus standi.
12 Dec 2023The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by four individuals claiming to be residents and devotees of a temple located at Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai. T...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Meeting Without Rally in Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Permission for Vishal Maharally. Court directs respondents to consider fresh application for public meeting within 24 hours, without expressing opinion on refusal of rally permission.
4 Oct 2022The petitioners, Bharat Mukti Morcha (a social organization) and its member Anil Nagare, sought to hold a 'Vishal Maharally' (giant rally) of persons ...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Police Notice Under Section 149 CrPC Restraining Construction on Private Land Due to Alleged Dargah — Police Cannot Adjudicate Civil Rights or Property Disputes Under the Guise of Preventive Action.
27 Jul 2022The petitioner, M/s. Rai Udyog Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a notice dated 28.06.2021 issued by the State of M...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.
7 Feb 2022The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...
- 126
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Reference of Questions of Law to Larger Bench in Review Petition — Maintainability of Reference Affirmed. The Court held that its power to refer questions of law to a larger bench in a review petition is not barred by Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and can be exercised under Article 142 to do complete justice.
10 Feb 2020The judgment arises from a reference made by a three-judge bench in review petitions against the Supreme Court's 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers...
- 251
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pontiff's Appeal Against FIR Quashing in Criminal Defamation Case — Allegations of Sexual Assault and Criminal Intimidation by a Seer Against a Woman and Her Family Not Quashed at Threshold.
9 Feb 2015The appellant, a 39-year-old pontiff of Shree Samsthana Gokarna – Shree Ramachandrapura Mutta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Article 2...
- 27
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Decreeing Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.
29 Aug 2013The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Doddaballapur, in OS No.275/2002 (old No.76/2001), d...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
- 89
